The trouble with transparency
I've thought a lot about transparency lately, and why it doesn't seem to quite work out for me. I made a bold statement when I was made CEO of Good Old (and was utterly crushed by Joakim :). I thought it would be easy to run a company differently than most others. It turns out I was right and wrong at the same time. Doing it is easy, accepting the consequences is not.
For the sake of argument I have taken the liberty of dividing "transparency" into five parts that can be applied to these issues. There may be more, feel free to add more below.
Transparency with ideas
This one is fairly easy - this blog does just that. I share my ideas on what's going on in the world. It can be comments on news, new ideas or just a thought that I had. As this is a corporate blog my views are somewhat connected to my company, and therefore it also has a mirroring effect from our office. I suppose it tells the world "we have read about X and this is what we think about it". This has clearly had a positive effect on the company when it comes to contacts and PR, but I wouldn't say that my blog has brought in any new clients. Not directly at least.
In this sense, sharing ones ideas and insight is not particularly controversial from a transparency point of view. Most companies could probably do this successfully one way or another.
Transparency for a laugh
Not to be underestimated. Our photos on Flickr are there because we think it's funny. And if someone else agrees - yay! If not, well, it doesn't really matter.
Transparency with location/status
Communicating through Jaiku and Dopplr has a very practical aspect for me as I spend a lot of time travelling and my colleagues want to know what I'm up to. It also comes in handy when I hold presentations about that sort of thing and people ask me "who the hell can be bothered to do that sort of thing?" ;)
Practicalities aside, there is an integrity aspect to be considered. I chose (fairly) carefully what to write, especially when I'm not working, in order to stay on a level of openness that I think is fit. Some things can't be communicated this way for other reasons that are stated below.
Transparency with clients
Being transparent with who I'm having meetings with is nothing that my clients will benefit from. I doubt that they care who I meet when I'm not working with them.
"Meeting with a new potential client in Stockholm" might be a typical Jaiku - now what's really transparent about that? It says something - but is that something of any value to anyone? Doubtful. If it's like the example, and I wrote the name of the company that we were pitching at, I would also be telling our competitors that they are looking for a new agency to work with (or something similar). Personally that doesn't really worry me, but from a business point of view I can't really justify giving out that information. The potential gain of me telling it is too small in comparison with the risk.
Some of my clients don't want me to be transparent about them. It's fine me writing about Good Old, but how much interesting stuff do we do that isn't connected to a client? Not much, in all honesty. We're consultants after all. If my client wants me to be secretive I have to respect that.
Transparency with business
Imagine that we had a major disagreement with one of our clients. Could we write about that? Should we? It would definitely be transparent as it would be reflecting the issue that probably would have taken most time from us at the time. But what would we gain from telling that story?
Or say that we were in financial trouble. No money left to pay our salaries at the end of the month. What could we possibly gain from telling the world about that? If I was a client and read my consultants blog and saw that they hardly had a dime left in their bank account - I'd get worried. I can't really justify transparency if it risks disturbing the relationship we have with our clients.
So say that we only write about the good stuff. Well, everyone does that! It doesn't make it more transparent just because we don't use press releases. Most corporate blogs that I read only ever discuss their business if things are going well. Unless you're a product company and want help from your readership in some way, but that's not quite the same thing.
* * *
All in all I've found it increasingly difficult to justify why I should, as CEO of a company, share all of this information with the rest of the world. Most of the time being transparent is easy as you are only communicating the boring everyday life. But as soon as you actually get to the juicy stuff - well, that's when you need to start thinking. What will my company gain from sharing this information? When I do, I often find that it ends up on the minus side after all. I wish it didn't.
This is my perspective from my specific company. I'd love your thoughts and experiences regarding these issues.
tags technorati : transparency
tags bloggar.se: transparens






10Kommentarer
Morris Packer / 20.18, 1 februari /- besvara
No one ever said that it would be an easy journey, love.
Rasmus / 20.18, 1 februari /- besvara
As you write, it was a too bold statement, esp. for a consultancy. There’s only so many ways for such a company to communicate what makes them different from other consultants, and client work is always part of that. How can we explain to the world what we do and thus why to choose us, when some clients don’t even let us write that we work for them? It’s been interesting to follow your excursions, though. :)
Björn Jeffrey och Chokladfabriken « Opportunity Cloud / 20.18, 1 februari /- besvara
[...] Björn Jeffrey är VD på Malmöföretaget Good Old. Han har haft den uttalande ambitionen att vara en transparent VD med hjälp av webbens alla möjligheter. Öppenhet, dialog och genomskinlighet har varit ledord. Nyligen skrev han om sina erfarenheter kring detta: I thought it would be easy to run a company differently than most others. It turns out I was right and wrong at the same time. Doing it is easy, accepting the consequences is not. [...]
/personal » Blog Archive » Transparency and blogging about b / 20.18, 1 februari /- besvara
[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]
Sorosh Tavakoli / 20.18, 1 februari /- besvara
Great thoughts on the topic Björn!
Honestly, I haven’t thought too much about this topic even if I said I’d join your transparency competition. Until now, I’ve just tried to follow my gut instinct and be open about the things that feels ok. But as you in a good way point out here, there are a lot of times where there are more negative consequenses than positive ones to be open about the things you are thinking or doing.
There’s also another issue wt this transparency, it consumes a lot of time. Let’s see how this develops…
Next Generation Internet » Blog Archive » Transparens / 20.18, 1 februari /- besvara
[...] Björn Jeffrey har delat med sig av sina tankar runt transparens i sitt dagliga liv. Intressant. Har inte riktigt bestämt om jag vill ha mer eller mindre transparens än Björn, men mag-gropen säger mer. Björns vinklingar är lite av “worst case” stilen (fort relevanta så klart). [...]
Transparens - därför funkar det · Mindpark / 20.18, 1 februari /- besvara
[...] Det har varit mycket spinn runt transparens de sista dagarna. Björn har skrivit ett bra inlägg under rubriken ” The trouble with transparency” som bygger vidare på hans gamla postning där han lovade att han skulle bli sveriges mest transparenta VD. En utmaning som vi var ett par som plockade upp… Niclas följde upp genom att slå fast att transparens är ordet för dagen, och JMW konstaterar att ” transparens kräver mod”. [...]
deep|edition » Lite korta om bloggar, framtid och transparen / 20.18, 1 februari /- besvara
[...] Uppdatering: Om Jocke är kung på transparens så är Björn kronprinsen. Läs hans tankar om det hela. [...]
Webb-TV-tips: Startup Junkies « Opportunity Cloud / 20.18, 1 februari /- besvara
[...] Transparens som heter duga, får man säga. Filed under: Affärsutveckling, Storytelling | [...]
Transparency « alfred malmros / 20.18, 1 februari /- besvara
[...] I started this blog with means to make my life as a student in communications, as a job hunter and as a copywriter transparent to anyone interested. The effect would be that I would reflect constantly on my progress, that possible employers could follow my process and perhaps to inspire others in a related situation. I remembered a post that Björn Jeffrey at the Swedish Internet strategy bureau Good Old wrote on his blog about the same issue. His problems with the wished transparency on his blog is that he writes a corporate blog, where every word is in the company’s name and he points out a couple of other relevant issues. One, is that clients doesn’t wish for their business to be transparent. [...]
Skriv ny kommentar